A new arXiv paper challenges the standard approach to AI alignment, which treats human preferences as fixed targets, arguing instead that preferences are dynamic and shaped through interaction with AI systems. Researchers introduce "Constructive Alignment," a control-theoretic framework that reframes alignment as governing how AI systems influence the evolution of human values over time, with safeguards against manipulation and emphasis on reflective endorsement.
Why it matters: As AI systems become increasingly personalized and socially embedded, understanding how they shape human preferences has critical implications for ensuring long-term value alignment and preventing subtle forms of preference capture.